If they can do documentaries on real animals, why cant they documentaries on mystical ones?Īsk yourself, do you hate all fictional movies, books and songs because they are based on an unreality? no, so what good reason is there to hate this? The mocks use factual mystery to create this fiction, that is what makes it better. This one got a lot of hate speech also but if you watch these with an open mind and realize that they are actually for entertainment purposes you can actually enjoy it. Animal planet did another mockumentary on the Yeti and the Dyatlov pass incident. It is both as bad as you remember it but somehow endlessly entertaining.I dont know why everyone is so upset by this, mermaids do not exist so obviously this is not a documentary. For another, this is a Netflix and chill movie, not something you want to see in a theater filled with suburban housewives and Paul Reubens. For one thing, Madonna and Julianne Moore fighting over William Defoe sounds like a mental patient's fan fiction. I certainly understand the panning this received when it hit the local cineplex in 1992. Where did that come from and how did Madonna allow herself to be upstaged. Is that a young naked Julianne Moore? Wow, that sex scene is so intense. The overconfident prosecution doesn't object. Looks like they are going to show a clip. Exhibit C: That one scene you forgot was in the movie: The defense is wheeling out a TV and DVD player. There were a lot of them in that time period (Heck there were two with Billy Baldwin for God's sake) So we often will revisit the lesser known ones for some nostalgia much like future generations will watch Ant-Man and muse how they don't make Superhero movies anymore. We really don't see them like these anymore and haven't for a long time. Exhibit B: Erotic Thrillers: Erotic thrillers enjoyed a moment between Basic Instinct and Showgirls. She certainly gives a better performance than Anne Archer. Also, she really isn't bad in this movie considering the lines she is given. We are not inundated with Madonna nowadays (naked or otherwise) so she seems fresh again. "You think there are men in this country who ain't seen your bosoms?" What a difference twenty-six years makes. As Rosie O'Donnell said to her in A League of Their Own. People were buying $50 coffee books that consisted if nothing but pictures of her naked while hitchhiking. The Defense: Exhibit A: Madonna: In 1992 naked Madonna was everywhere. The prosecution is feeling a bit overconfident there and rested their case without mentioning Anne Archer's performance or the horrifying screenplay. Exhibit C: Madonna: Madonna makes bad movies. Both are wonderful charismatic actors but nobody wants to see William Defoe's O face. Yes, he's wearin' that dumb Power Rangers maskīut he's scarier without it on Now If William Defoe switched roles with Joe Mantegna as the prosecutor that might have worked a lot better. Defoe in his song "Ode To A Superhero"Īnd he's ridin' around on that glider thingĪnd he's throwin' that weird pumpkin bomb But as the lead character in an erotic thriller? As Weird Al Yankovic wrote about Mr. Exhibit B: William Defoe: I genuinely like William Defoe. The judge allows so many shenanigans that she makes Judge Ito look like Judge Judy. The scenes here are pointless with half a dozen side characters introduced and then forgotten. Now courtroom scenes can work in thrillers (see 1990's Presumed Innocent), but they should be to the point and thrilling. However, it spends an amazing amount of time in the courtroom. Body of Evidence is often considered an erotic thriller. The case for the Prosecution: Exhibit A: The courtroom scenes: AKA half the bloody movie. Will her lawyer get her off? Will she get him off? Stay tuned for the drama both inside and outside of the courtroom. Body of Evidence: 7 out of 10: A woman is on trial for seducing men to death.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |